Committee conflicts
Trades and disclosed holdings where the politician sits on a committee whose jurisdiction overlaps the security's sector. Not an accusation of wrongdoing — STOCK Act trades are legal — but a structural conflict-of-interest signal worth noting.
Who owns what they regulate
Disclosed annual holdings in sectors the politician's committee or agency oversees, sorted by upper-bound disclosed value. Click any row to expand the per-position detail and source filing.
M & T Bank⚑ Financial ServicesRanking Member, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on 4 committees including Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions holds Financial Services-sector security; this committee has substantive jurisdiction over this sector.Disclosed: $15K – $50K
Bernard SandersISenate⚑ Financial Services1 position$15K – $50K
| Holding | Sector | Why it's flagged | Disclosed band | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
M & T Bank | ⚑ Financial Services | Ranking Member, Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on 4 committees including Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions holds Financial Services-sector security; this committee has substantive jurisdiction over this sector. | $15K – $50K | Senate EFD → |
Every flagged trade
Individual buy/sell disclosures from the STOCK Act periodic transaction reports, flagged where the trade's sector aligns with the politician's committee jurisdiction at the time it was filed.
Conflict flags are computed automatically by matching each politician's active committee assignments against the GICS sector of every ticker they trade or hold. A flag is a structural signal, not an accusation: STOCK Act trades are legal and Annual financial disclosures are required by law. Read the full methodology.